ITV Big Brother viewers brand nominations 'pointless' after new rule

Big Brother's latest episode came packed with drama as the housemates faced their latest round of nominations, which included a twist that left viewers at home less than pleased.

Fans have criticised the show, claiming a new rule has 'ruined' the nomination process.

In a controversial move this season, Big Brother has been appointing a Head of House each week, granting them the power to sway key events, including significantly changing nomination outcomes.

So far, Khaled, Ali, Dean, Emma, and most recently Marcello have served as Head of House, with some of their decisions sparking conflict within the house.

Marcello's shocking intervention this week led to a twist in the eviction plans; what initially set Thomas on course for the public vote saw Marcello save him and put Baked Potato at risk, despite receiving no nominations, reports the Mirror.

Displeased fans vented on social media about their frustrations with the rule, with one viewer stating: "I never want Big Brother to do this head of house again btw, it has completely ruined nominations all series." (sic)

One viewer expressed disappointment, saying: "What's the point of nominating when they don't count for anything. This head of house thing makes the entire experiment pointless. It takes the fun out of it. This series has been quite flat and not really memorable compared to last years." (sic)

Another fan shared their hopes for future series: "I hope this head of house twist doesn't come back every series. Feels a lot." (sic)

Housemates Lily, Emma, Ali, Khaled, and Baked Potato find themselves on the chopping block, with their fate now in the hands of the public.

The eviction process is set to begin shortly, with voting available exclusively through the Big