Eminem loses five-year legal battle with Spotify over music streaming rights

Spotify has won a five-year court case against rapper Eminem over whether the music platform had been streaming his music without a licence.

Eminem sued Spotify in 2019 via his publisher Eight Mile Style accusing the streamer for not correctly licensing his work before putting it on the platform.

Spotify won the case even though the court found that Spotify did not have a licence to stream the tracks involved in the suit.

Had Spotify been found guilty of the alleged copyright infringement, it still wouldn’t have been responsible for compensating Eminem directly. It would be Kobalt Music Group, who collect Eminem’s royalties on behalf of Eight Mile Style.

So why has Eminem lost this case? The rapper’s company originally filed the suit because they claimed that Spotify had deceptively pretended to have the licences for 243 of his songs.

Eight Mile Style alleged that even though these tracks had been streamed billions of times, Spotify had not “paid Eight Mile for these streams but instead remitted random payments of some sort, which only purport to account for a fraction of those streams”.

This amounted to “willful copyright infringement” the publisher alleged. Notably, at this stage, Eminem himself was unaware of the lawsuit and his music has remained on the platform the entire time.

Spotify responded to the lawsuit in 2020 by claiming it was entirely Kobalt Music Group’s fault and that as the company that administers the rights to Eminem’s music, they had misled Spotify into believing they had the rights to stream the rapper.

In short, Spotify alleged that Kobalt had entered into an agreement with them to licence Eminem’s music without Kobalt actually having those rights from Eight Mile.

From this point on the case