Vogue Should Have Featured All Of The WNBA On Cover, Not Just Angel Reese

WNBA forward Angel Reese is the latest cover girl for Vogue Magazine. In the edition, the magazine celebrates Reese's passion for both basketball and fashion. 

"It’s always been both: basketball and fashion," Reese told the outlet. "I was a fashion girlie from young too. That desire to look finished applies on and off the court: Reese earned her Bayou Barbie nickname at Louisiana State thanks to her penchant for glamming up for games."

Great, but why just Angel Reese? 

Why couldn't Vogue have put the entire WNBA on the cover? Reese is certainly not the only player in the league who cares about both fashion and basketball.

Caitlin Clark, Breanna Stewart, and Cameron Brink also showed off their snazzy wardrobes before their games last season. Reese did not introduce the crossover between fashion and basketball.

Vogue's decision to feature only Angel Reese on the cover is disrespectful to the other women. One player is not bigger than the entire league, and singling out just one player could create hard feelings.

And what about all the players before her? The black women who paved the way for Reese and her generation to play in the WNBA today? We cannot forget about the HERstory of the game.

Do you see how ridiculous, manufactured, and pathetic this argument is? Can you picture the anti-white racists fuming across their screens as they read our every line?

Perhaps our faux argument demonstrates how farcical the argument was that Time should have featured the "entire WNBA on the cover" as opposed to just Caitlin Clark, who was named Time Athlete of the Year for 2024.

Here's what Washington Mystics owner Sheila Johnson had to say from a December 13 interview with CNN:

"This year, something clicked with the WNBA and it’s