'Ridiculous' Jack Grealish point made after Harry Kane downs Man City for Tottenham

Manchester City signing Jack Grealish and not Harry Kane has come to the fore once more after the England captain scored twice and was awarded man of the match in Tottenham Hotspur's win over the Premier League leaders.

Kane twice gave Spurs the lead, first just before the hour mark and then once and for all in the fifth minute of added time to cancel out Riyad Mahrez's equaliser from the penalty spot three minutes prior.

Grealish is still sidelined with a shin injury, with Saturday evening's match the third consecutive match the former Villa captain has missed this month after also being unavailable for trips to face Norwich City and Sporting in the Champions League.

Here is a selection of the social media reaction from football fans to Harry Kane's performance against Man City in Grealish's absence.

City should’ve just paid £200 million on Kane than pay £100 million on Jack Grealish.

Harry Kane was mopping the floor with Manchester City asking them why did they waste all that money on Jack Grealish.

Said it since August, buying Grealish over Kane was absolutely ridiculous. Bought the player they had 2 or 3 of over the player they don’t have.

Pep needs to explain to Sheikh Mansour why the 100m was spent on Grealish instead of Kane.

Jack Grealish, the man Manchester City splashed 100M for was nowhere to be seen as Harry Kane, the man they should have spent the money on comes to haunt them at their own turf.

Will Man City be itching their skin and going all out for Harry Kane in the summer. What a performance. WB, DM, CM, FW within a single game. A robust statement from Harry Kane. Grealish could be included in the deal, for all I care.