Premier League vote for spending cap and to keep VAR

A Premier League spending cap opposed by Manchester City and two other top-flight clubs will be trialled next season.

Clubs agreed at Thursday's Premier League annual general meeting to test out top-to-bottom anchoring (TBA) on a non-binding basis, as well as squad cost rules (SCR) similar to those already introduced by UEFA at European level.

City, who have separately launched a legal claim against Premier League rules governing the valuation of commercial deals, were understood to be one of three clubs, along with Manchester United and Aston Villa, who voted against proceeding with a legal and economic analysis of anchoring back in April.

The system would cap a club's spending on football costs such as player wages - regardless of how much revenue a club earns - as a multiple of the smallest central Premier League television and prize money allocation to be received by any club.

The multiple initially being trialled is five times that smallest allocation. So if Southampton earned £100million from central funds next season, the most any club could spend on football costs would be £500m.

The Premier League said the shadow trial would enable the league to fully evaluate the system and "complete its consultation with all relevant stakeholders".

This will include the Professional Footballers' Association, which has said it will oppose any measure which amounts to a hard salary cap. The union has enlisted leading sports barrister Nick De Marco to represent it in this matter, the man who helped the PFA force the withdrawal of an EFL salary cap introduced in 2020.

The Premier League said anchoring was "a pre-emptive measure to protect the competitive balance of the Premier League".

"This protection is intended not to have an impact