Man City might not be able to resist Arsenal and Liverpool revenge after transfer window

However the Premier League title race pans out this season, for once figures at the Emirates and Anfield won't be able to point to Manchester City's spending as a key differentiator.

In recent years, figures connected to Arsenal and Liverpool have frequently criticised City's financial power, whether the evidence stacked up or not.

Arsene Wenger regularly criticises City's ownership and approach, and Jurgen Klopp was never shy of lighting the financial fires before he faced Pep Guardiola's side. He once claimed they were one of "three clubs in world football who can do what they want financially."

Even Arne Slot joined in last year. In an answer about the strength of the Premier League, he said that Paris St-Germain were "a team that, together with Manchester City, have unlimited amounts of money to spend."

If that is true, then City have clearly decided not to spend it this summer. They are being comfortably outspent by Arsenal and Liverpool to set up what looks like an enthralling title race this season.

City pulled out of the race to sign Florian Wirtz due to the fees involved, leaving the coast clear. Instead, they opted to sign Tijjani Reijnders and Rayan Cherki for a combined fee of £77.3million rather than spending a similar sum on Morgan Gibbs-White alone.

Across 2025, the Blues have signed eight players for a total outlay of £291million. That's an average cost of around £36.3million per player, and their most expensive deal is the £59million spent on signing Omar Marmoush from Eintracht Frankfurt.

This summer alone, Liverpool will spend more than City's figure across the last two windows, and in Wirtz and Hugo Ekitike, they will spend more on individuals than City did on Marmoush.

It's a similar story in North