India vs Australia: 'Pathetic' Umpiring Slammed After India Left Dismayed Over Mitchell Marsh DRS Call

The second day of the second India vs Australia Test saw a controversial moment. Before the end of the first session, India sensed an opportunity and went for a DRS appeal for LBW against Australia's Mitchell Marsh. The on-field umpire gave him not out. India was sure about a LBW and went for a DRS. The third umpire said there are no conclusive evidence that the ball hit the pad first and stayed with the on-field umpire's decision. However, the front on replay suggested otherwise.

Ravi Ashwin to Mitchell Marsh..

- Ball hits clearly on pad first but 3rd Umpire says there is not conclusive evidence to overturn on field umpire decision..!!

pic.twitter.com/dWJ0I6d3wE

#IndvAus Controversy!!! Controversy!!

That looked PAD 1st..

Ashwin went for DRS..

3rd umpire Kettleborough says its Bat 1st..

Ridiculous if that would have been an Indian batsman.. it would have been pad 1st..

The slo mo shows clear PAD 1st.. Marsh the batsman.. pic.twitter.com/J5kdDKmo9x

Mitchell Marsh was lbw on Ashwin's ball, but the umpire did not give him out, The ball first hit the Pad & Then hit the bat 3rd given not out what is the meaning of technology in cricket when you do not give the right decision?#AUSvIND #TeamIndia #Pushpa2TheRule pic.twitter.com/Qvwzm3ETdv

This is pathetic by Richard Kettleborough. He was unsure of bat first or pad first but gave not out based on Snicko. Mitchell Marsh was safe as impact was umpires call but India would have kept the crucial review. #INDvAUS #INDvsAUS #indvsausTestseriespic.twitter.com/CZU8dpWSXy

Talking about the match, Marnus Labuschagne finally regained form with a composed half-century before being overshadowed by Travis Head's flamboyance as Australia negotiated the Indian pacers to reach 191 for four at tea on