Gareth Southgate questions what a World Cup boycott would achieve for England

Gareth Southgate has questioned what an England boycott of the World Cup would achieve, admitting whatever action is taken by his team will be met with criticism from some quarters.

Accusations concerning the treatment of migrant workers and a poor record of human rights have plagued the Gulf state since it was controversially awarded the finals in 2010.

Male homosexuality is punishable by a prison sentence, same-sex marriages are not recognised by the government and women’s rights are much tighter than in some other parts of the world.

Southgate previously said it is a “great shame” that sections of England supporters will not travel to Qatar for the World Cup this winter and stressed that no one is “complacent” about the issues involved.

He hosted a 30-minute meeting with the current squad at St George’s Park on Tuesday night, discussing the ongoing challenges in Qatar and opening a dialogue on how England could show their opposition.

It appears that will not include a full boycott of the finals, which kick-off in November, as Southgate does not feel that would send the sort of message required to shine a light on the issues.

“I don’t really know what that achieves,” he replied when asked if a boycott of the World Cup had been discussed at any stage.

“It would of course be a big story but this tournament would go ahead. The fact is, unfortunately, the biggest issue that is probably non-religious or non-cultural is what happened with the building of the stadiums. There’s nothing we can do about that either sadly.

“I think as soon as we’ve entered the tournament that’s the point we decide. We’ve known for four years or eight years that this is going to be in Qatar. Is the stance against Qatar as a country? If that’s the