College Sports Commission Wins NIL Arb Case Against Nebraska Football Players

An arbitrator ruled in favor of the College Sports Commission on Monday in a case brought on behalf of Nebraska football players that is viewed as a key test for the new entity in charge of approving third-party name-image-likeness deals in college sports.

The CSC in a statement said the arbitrator affirmed the commission's decision to reject third-party NIL agreements between Nebraska's multimedia rights (MMR) partner, Playfly, and the players.

At issue was whether Nebraska's MMR partner would be considered an "associated entity" — deals from which are subject to CSC scrutiny.

With that decided, the CSC said the arbitrator rejected the deals because:

— They lacked what the CSC calls a "valid business purpose" because they did not include goods or services offered to the general public for profit.

— Playfly violated a rule against "warehousing" NIL rights — i.e., paying for the rights to use for some purpose later instead of employing them right away.

Speaking to media at the Atlantic Coast Conference meetings in Florida, the CSC's CEO, Bryan Seeley, said he didn't consider the deal to be a precedent.

"Even if it’s not precedential, the fact is it’s influential, and it’s influential in people’s minds about how they think about enforcement," he said. "So, for me, it was a good day."

Nebraska Cornhuskers wide receiver Jacory Barney Jr (2) and tight end Luke Lindenmeyer (44) celebrate a touchdown during the SRS Distribution Las Vegas Bowl featuring the Nebraska Cornhuskers vs. the Utah Utes. (Photo by Steve Nurenberg/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

The CSC said it would release the arbitrator's full decision later.

Some observers are curious to see whether the university or the state will sue over the decision, something