Journalist's Damning Rant About Roman Abramovich In 2013 Is Going Viral Once Again

Abramovich has frequently denied links to Putin but Syed, who writes for the Times, questioned Abramovich's presence in the Premier League years ago.

The views below are those of Matthew Syed and not SPORTbible.

Syed said during an appearance of Sky Sports News: "Well he’s definitely spent a lot of money there’s no disputing that. But one has to look at how he’s amassed his wealth and his QC, Jonathan Sumption admitted in open court in his case against Boris Berezovsky that he had secured his money in a rigged privatisation.

"Essentially, the Oligarchs did a deal with Boris Yeltsin, who was running for re-election. ‘We will back your campaign, we will give you free advertising if you sell us the mineral wealth of the Russian people at a knockdown price.’

"Sumption admitted this, it’s not in dispute and that’s stolen money – if it can use the word. Certainly, fraudulently got.

"It’s what is bankrolling Chelsea which has paid for the academy, inflated first-team football salaries and you can’t look at this in a purely footballing context. You have to look at the wider moral context and, in that sense, it’s been a deeply corrosive influence on British football."

He continued: "Tony [Cascarino] talked about the fact that he has continued to invest and reinvest. He was never in Chelsea to make a profit. He wasn’t investing in order to make a return which is the way most people operate commercial assets. He bought Chelsea for protection. He knew there was a risk that Putin would come after him like he has with other Oligarchs for his role in this very dubious business practice under Yeltsin.

"And he knew one of the best ways of protecting himself from being got at by the Russian authorities was to associate himself with a highly