Players.bio is a large online platform sharing the best live coverage of your favourite sports: Football, Golf, Rugby, Cricket, F1, Boxing, NFL, NBA, plus the latest sports news, transfers & scores. Exclusive interviews, fresh photos and videos, breaking news. Stay tuned to know everything you wish about your favorite stars 24/7. Check our daily updates and make sure you don't miss anything about celebrities' lives.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Everton face threat of multimillion-pound legal bill from quartet over FFP case

Everton face legal action from Leicester, Leeds, Southampton and Burnley that could run into tens of millions of pounds if they lose their case for an alleged breach of the Premier League’s financial fair play rules, which the Guardian understands will be heard on 25 October.

Everton were referred to an independent commission on 24 March in relation to their spending from the 2021-22 season and it was the trigger for Leicester, Leeds, Southampton, Burnley and Nottingham Forest to write to the league, demanding that the case be heard before the end of the season.

At the end of 2021-22, Leeds and Burnley had met the league to question whether Everton had broken the rules after they recorded losses of £371.8m over a three-year period. The league allows clubs to lose a maximum of £105m over a rolling three‑year cycle – and those who do not comply can be fined or deducted points.

The league told Leeds and Burnley back then that it did not believe there was a case against Everton. When they brought the action against them in March, there was frustration among the clubs that were in the relegation battle with Everton – plus Burnley, who had gone down in 2021‑22. Leeds stayed up on the final day of that season while Everton also survived.

It is understood the clubs took collective legal advice and their demand for Everton’s case to be expedited was based on the fact that whichever of them were relegated this season could not be adequately compensated in a financial way after the fact; any needed sporting sanctions, the clubs argued, had to take place as soon as possible for the integrity of the competition. The league indicated that it would not or could not hurry the case through.

Forest would survive and, as such, appear less

Read more on theguardian.com